Nuclear

Every nuclear power station, and what it taught us

Nuclear is the most scrutinised way humans make electricity. This map plots the world's nuclear stations — running, being built, stopped, dismantled and never started — so the record can be read as one picture. Hover a pin for its capacity, reactor count and the operating or construction lesson attached to it.

205
Stations mapped
41 countries
378 GW
Operating capacity
net electrical
418
Operating reactor units
IAEA PRIS tracks ~416
205
Shown with current filters
Loading map…

Zooming needs ctrl/⌘ + scroll on a desktop or two fingers on touch, so the page keeps scrolling normally. Marker size scales with the capacity built at the site; capacity for shut-down, decommissioned and cancelled stations is what they were designed to deliver, not what they produce today. Multi-unit sites are shown as one pin at the station.

Reactor counts are per station, so the operating total lands in the same band as the reference trackers: 404 operating units and about 369 GW in the World Nuclear Industry Status Report, roughly 416 units in the IAEA PRIS database, which also counts long-idle Japanese units as active. Background: IAEA, six global trends in nuclear power.

The fleet by status

Operational
378 GW

159 stations · 418 reactor units

Under construction
13 GW

4 stations · 11 reactor units

Suspended
8.0 GW

1 station · 7 reactor units

Shut down
30 GW

19 stations · 38 reactor units

Decommissioned
29 GW

17 stations · 40 reactor units

Cancelled
4.9 GW

5 stations · 6 reactor units

Where nuclear capacity is concentrated

Total capacity built at mapped sites in each country, whatever its status today.

United States108 GW
France64 GW
China56 GW
Japan38 GW
Russia26 GW
South Korea26 GW
Ukraine17 GW
Canada14 GW
Germany10 GW
United Kingdom9.2 GW
India8.9 GW
Sweden8.1 GW

What the record actually shows

Accidents came from cooling, not fission

Three Mile Island, Chernobyl and Fukushima were all failures to remove heat after shutdown — instrumentation, a prohibited test, a drowned backup supply. Modern designs assume operators and power will both fail.

First-of-a-kind is where money is lost

Flamanville 3, Olkiluoto 3, Hinkley Point C and Vogtle 3-4 each roughly doubled in cost. The same designs repeated in series — Barakah, Yangjiang, Sanmen — landed far closer to plan.

Politics closes plants that engineering passed

Barsebäck, Fessenheim, Zwentendorf, Lungmen and Germany's last three reactors were all closed or stopped while licensable. Belgium, Sweden, Japan and Taiwan have since reversed course.

Life extension beats new build economically

Bruce and Darlington refurbishments, Peach Bottom's 80-year licence and Koeberg's steam-generator swap all bought decades of output for a fraction of a new station's cost.

Newcomers succeed with a fleet, not a prototype

The UAE ordered four identical Korean units with a full turnkey team and finished near schedule. Programmes that started with one bespoke reactor — Bataan, Angra 3, Atucha II — stalled for decades.

Waste is solved on paper, and now in rock

Finland's Onkalo and Sweden's Forsmark repository are licensed and being filled. The obstacle everywhere else has been siting consent, not the geology or the engineering.